From Dutch dit (“this”), from Middle Dutch dit, from Old Dutch thit.

Demiraj, Bardhyl et al. (2021), “ai”, in DPEWA. Digitales Philologisch-Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altalbanischen [DPEWA. Digital Philological-Etymological Dictionary of Old Albanian] https://www.dpwa.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/dictionary/?lemmaid=21924 

In the spoken language, նա (na) is much more often a personal pronoun than a demonstrative, with demonstrative function fulfilled by դա (da) or էնի (ēni), depending on register. 

irika (M), iroka (F) ‘proximal’, irinta (M), ironta (F) ‘medial’ and irintó (M), irontó (F) ‘distal’ 

irirori ‘he’, iroori ‘she’

Dai Qingxia, Jiang Ying, Kong Zhien, A Study of Pela Language (2007; Publishing House of Minority Nationalities, Beijing)

Platts, John T. (1884), A dictionary of Urdu, classical Hindi, and English, London: W. H. Allen & Co. https://dsal.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/app/platts_query.py?qs=%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%B9&searchhws=yes&matchtype=exact

From Classical Latin ipsum, accusative form of ipse (“himself; the very”). 

In colloquial Korean, 걔 (along with deictic variants 얘 (yae), 쟤 (jae)) is the word that most closely resembles the English third-person pronoun. Despite the etymology, it can be used for all human referents with the restrictions given below, and is value-neutral.

the use of 걔 implies that the person being referred to by the pronoun is of equal or lower social rank compared to the speaker. When referring to a social superior, speakers use either a title, a word referring to the relationship between the speaker and the addressee, or circumlocutional phrases like 그분 (geubun, “that [honored] person”). Thus a college student may use the pronoun 걔 to refer to a classmate, but their professor must be referred to as 교수님 (gyosunim, “honorable professor”).

The use of 걔 in socially impermissible contexts, such as when referring to a superior, should be understood as the speaker showing contempt for the referent. 

al (Badiot)
el (Fascian)

iddu (eye dialect)
illu (Maletto)
eḍḍu (dialectal, Galloitalic of Sicily)

a + absolutive

avan (M), avaḷ (F) ‘remote’ and ivan (M), ivaḷ (F) ‘proximal’ 

Berntsen, Maxine (1982–1983), A Basic Marathi-English Dictionary, New Delhi: American Institute of Indian Studies https://dsal.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/app/berntsen_query.py?qs=%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87&searchhws=yes&matchtype=exact 
Shankar Gopal Tulpule; Anne Feldhaus (1999), A Dictionary of Old Marathi, Mumbai: Popular Prakashan https://dsal.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/app/tulpule_query.py?qs=%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%82&searchhws=yes&matchtype=exact 

deë (Southeast Limburgish), déë (Eupen), daeë (Voeren), dee (Maastrichtian)

< English that

http://ena.ge/explanatory-online?ls=YToyOntzOjEyOiJ3b3JkX21ldGF1cmkiO3M6OToi4YOY4YOS4YOYIjtzOjExOiJ3b3JkX3N0YXRpYSI7czowOiIiO30=

Clauson, Gerard (1972), An Etymological Dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish, Oxford: Clarendon Press, page 123
Tekin, Talât (1968), A Grammar of Orkhon Turkic (Uralic and Altaic Series; 69), Bloomington: Indiana University, page 358

Henrik Liljegren; Naseem Haider (2011), “so”, in Palula Vocabulary (FLI Language and Culture Series; 7)‎, Islamabad, Pakistan: Forum for Language Initiatives

Papadópoulos, Ánthimos (1958), “ἀβοῦτος”, in Ιστορικόν λεξικόν της ποντικής διαλέκτου [An historical dictionary of the Pontic dialect] (Παράρτημα περιοδικού «Αρχείον Πόντου»; 3), volume I, Athens: Myrtidis, page 81b, assumes the word is formed as Turkish ha (deictic particle) + Ancient Greek οὗτος (hoûtos)
Tursun, Vahit (2021), “αβούτος”, in Romeika – Türkçe Sözlük : Trabzon Rumcası, 2nd edition, Istanbul: Heyamola Yayınları, page 48

Inherited from Sanskrit असौ (asáu, “that”)

Singh, Bhai Maya (1895), The Panjabi Dictionary, Lahore: Munshi Gulab Singh and Sons. https://dsal.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/app/singh_query.py?qs=%E0%A8%89%E0%A8%B9&searchhws=yes&matchtype=exact 
Punjabi-English Dictionary, Patiala: Punjabi University, 2026 http://dic.learnpunjabi.org/default.aspx?look=%E0%A8%89%E0%A8%B9

Eino Koponen, Klaas Ruppel, Kirsti Aapala, editors (2002–2008), Álgu database: Etymological database of the Saami languages‎, Helsinki: Research Institute for the Languages of Finland http://kaino.kotus.fi/algu/index.php?kkieli=en&t=lekseemi&lekseemi_id=105241

Gwynn, Roger (2016), Londoni Sylheti dictionary, Part I : Sylheti-English, Middletown, DE: Acre Press. https://dsal.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/app/sylheti_query.py?qs=he&searchhws=yes&matchtype=exact

Most likely from Old Hindi उहु (uhu), उहुं (uhuṃ), from Apabhramsa ओहु (ohu), from Prakrit 𑀅𑀳𑁄 (aho), from Sanskrit असौ (asau, “that”). The inflected forms are formed by analogy with its proximal counterpart یِہ (ye).

For Old Hindi वो (vo), Chatterji suggested a derivation from Apabhramsa ओ (o), from Sanskrit *अव (*ava), attested in अवोष् (avoṣ), अवोर् (avor, “of you both”, gen. du.), from Proto-Indo-Iranian *avá. He suggested the term not being preserved in literature but continuing to be spoken. Compare Avestan 𐬀𐬬𐬀 (ava).

Development of Pronominal Systems from Apabhraṃśa to New Indo-Aryan”, in Indo-Iranian Journal, volume 39, number 2, April 1996, pages 111-132
Oberlies, Thomas (2005), A Historical Grammar of Hindi, Grazer Vergleichende Arbeiten, page 23 

Inherited from Old Hindi यहु (yahu), from Apabhramsa एहु m (ehu), एह f (eha), from Prakrit 𑀏𑀲𑁄 m (eso), 𑀏𑀲𑀸 f (esā), from Sanskrit एषः m (eṣaḥ), एषा f (eṣā)

Oberlies, Thomas (2005), A Historical Grammar of Hindi, Grazer Vergleichende Arbeiten, page 22

Hallap, V.; Adler, E.; Grünberg, S.; Leppik, M. (2012), Vadja keele sõnaraamat, 2nd edition, Tallinn https://www.eki.ee/dict/vadja/index.cgi?Q=t%C3%A4m%C3%A4